Tora Bora 15 Disember 2001

Akhirnya, terbukti Obama mempunyai agenda tertentu dengan mengisytiharkan pembunuhan Osama. Siapakah yang dibunuh oleh tenteran Amerika pada 1 Mei 2011 yang lalu amat menarik uantuk difikirkan kerana Osama telah lama meninggal dunia. Semakin menghairankan berita ini (sebenarnya) telah disenyapkan dan tidak diulas oleh mana-mana akhbar utama antarabangsa termasuk di negara kita.

Pada tarikh 16 Disember, 2001 Osama Bin Ladin dilaporkan telah meninggal dunia dan dikebumikan di Tora Bora. Ia disiarkan oleh beberapa akhbar di Mesir dan Pakistan. Beliau mengalami penderitaan konpilasi paru-paru yang kronik dan meninggal dalam keadaan biasa dan aman. Ia disaksikan oleh beberapa ahli keluarga, rakan dan pejuang.

Adalah sukar untuk mengesan kuburannya kerana ia dikebumikankan mengikut tradisi Wahabbi yang tidak membenarkan tanda pada setiap kuburan. Secara amnya, sukar untuk dibuktikan bahawa Osama telah meninggal dunia dan ini memberi kesempatan kepada caturan baru USA-Zeo.

USA-Zeo membuat duplikasi Osama (seorang ejen CIA) dan mempergunakan watak ini sebagai manusia yang amat ganas dan menjadi perancang kerja sabotaj ke atas kepentingan USA sebagaimana dakwaan palsu peristiwa 911. Warga USA dengan mudah diperdaya sekaligus menyokong usaha Presidennya melaksanakan kerja membalas dendam ke atas Afghanistan dan seluruh umat Islam.

Sekaligus membuka peluang kepada gerakan Jesuits memburukkan agama Islam keseluruhannya sebagai agama yang ganas dan agama suci ini didakwa mempunyai elemen pengganas. Melalui kempen yang berterusan, ramai Muslimin yang tidak kuat imannya tergelincir ke dalam perangkap mereka.

Selanjutnya, Gerakan Kristianisasi sebagai cabang gerak halus Jesuits pula mengambil giliran mengkristiankan seramai mungkin orang Islam yang sebelum ini amat liat untuk dimurtadkan. Indonesia menjadi negara yang paling malang terjebak dalam gerakan mereka dan kini Malaysia pula sedang digempur.

Cuba teliti maklumat yang dibongkar oleh Global Research di bawah:

Global research Editor's Note

The translation from the Arabic has been verified on behalf of Global Research. This funeral announcement was published in the December 26 2001 edition of Al Wafd

Translation of Funeral Article in Egyptian Newspaper:
Al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633 

News of Bin Laden's Death and Funeral 10 days ago 

Islamabad. A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa'da organization, stating that bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, stated to The Observer of Pakistan that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in Tora Bora 10 days ago. He mentioned that 30 of al-Qa'da fighters attended the burial as well as members of his family and some friends from the Taleban. In the farewell ceremony to his final rest guns were fired in the air.

The official stated that it is difficult to pinpoint the burial location of bin Laden because according to the Wahhabi tradition no mark is left by the grave. He stressed that it is unlikely that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden. 

Ilusi Berjaya Dicipta

Dalam satu kajian yang dibuat oleh beberapa penganalisa konpirasi USA-Zeo menunjukkan alQaeda adalah rekaan semata-mata berasaskan satu nama database yang dipanggil al qaidat (kaedah) dan watak Usama pula dihidupkan kembali dan ditempatkan di Pakistan sebagai ejen CIA untuk memerangi Taliban di Afghanistan dan Pakistan. Semua ini adalah mainan politik Amerika-Zeo untuk mewujudkan sesuatu sebab untuk membolehkan sesuatu tindakan diambil ke atas sesuatu sasaran sepertimana Afghabistan, Iraq dan sekarang Libya serta Syria dan Pakistan di masa akan datang.

Malangnya semua negara ini adalah negara Islam. Bolehlah disimpulkan bahawa USA-Zeo ini adalah penyamaran Dajjal Laknatullah melaksanakan fitnah. Kita tunggu berita dari Isfahan, Iran. Kenapa? Cubalah fikirkan.

In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.


The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy.

According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.

September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

ANOTHER FAKED PHOTO

 Osama Bin Laden

ANOTHER FAKED PHOTO HITS THE PRESS! 

Taking a bullet for your husband and agreeing to live in a cave for him are surely the biggest gestures of love a woman can make.

But these are just days in the life of the wife of Osama bin Laden who - until Monday - was America's most wanted terrorist.

Amal Ahmed Abdul Fatah - thought to be Bin Laden's fifth and final wife - was shot in the calf when she charged at the Navy SEALs who stormed the room she had been living in with her husband for the last five years.

As Pakistani authorities took hold of the woman and her young daughter Safiyah, they hoped that questioning her could provide intricate details into the life of America's most hated enemy.

Take a close look at the fingers in the DailyMail photo of the passport. This is another photoshop creation and a very clumsy one at that. The face seems to be an overlay as well and not part of the actual image of the passport.

UPDATE: No sooner had I posted this expose' than the Daily Mail closed commenting for the article. I wonder if they will delete or try to replace their original image.

Claims: The wife of Osama Bin Laden, Amal al-Sadah, says she lived 
with her husband in the same room for the past five years

Home: She lived with her husband and their children in a room in this
compound for the last five years undetected

Iranian Intelligence Minister Heidar Moslehi said Tehran has evidence that al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden had died of disease long before the United States' alleged raid on the terrorist, FARS Iranian news agency said.

Bin Laden was killed on May 2 in the Pakistani town of Abbottabad, north of the capital Islamabad, during a raid by U.S. Navy Seals.

"We have accurate information that bin Laden died of illness some time ago," Moslehi said.

Bin Laden's body was buried at sea less than 24 hours after the operation.

"If the US military and intelligence apparatus have really arrested or killed bin Laden, why don't they show him (his dead body) why have they thrown his corpse into the sea?" Moslehi continued.

A DNA test proved that the corpse of the dead man belonged to bin Laden, who has topped the FBI's most wanted list for the past decade.

White House spokesman, Jay Carney said on Wednesday that Washington would not release bin Laden's postmortem photos to avoid instigating propaganda and possible violence.

MOSCOW, May 9 (RIA Novosti)

Komen saya:

Kenapa warga Yaman ini dikatakan isteri Osama masih menjadi persoalan setelah pengumuman kematian Osama dipertikai oleh pelbagai pihak. Sudah sampai masanya kita membuka minda meneliti setiap berita yang dipersembahkan terutama dari USA.

Cerita yang kita dengar amatlah disangsikan dan diyakini ia mempunyai muslihat untuk tindakan mereka pada masa hadapan. Mengapa begitu berbelit-belit dan rumit? Dari awal lagi nampak segalanya macan ada yang tidak kena. Saya yakin bukan Osama yang menjadi korban pada hari itu tetapi mangsa yang sengaja dipilih untuk membuka ruang yang lebih lebar untuk USA menipu dunia. Tentu sekali ia ada kaitan dengan Yaman Syria dan Libya.

“Wahai orang-orang yang beriman, jika datang kepada kalian orang Fasik dengan membawa berita, maka telitilah berita itu agar kalian tidak memberikan keputusan pada suatu kaum tanpa pengetahuan sehingga kalian akan menyesali diri atas apa yang telah kalian kerjakan” |Qs Al Hujurat: 6|

Dusta OBAMA mengenai Osama

aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson

Nampak ketara "pembohongan Washington" mengenai pembunuhan Osama Ben Laden yang dihebohkan oleh agensi berita seluruh dunia sejak semalam. Masakan mayat yang baru sahaja di kenali sebagai "Osana" itu telah dikebumikan begitu cepat (tergesa-gesa). Biasanya kes seperti ini mayat akan disimpan untuk ditunjukkan kepada umum dan tentunya akan melalui peroses yang lama selain meraikannya terlebih dahulu sebelum dikebumikan. Lebih menabjubkan, jasadnya disemadikan di laut pula dengan alasan tiada siapa yang sanggup menerimanya.

Dikebumikan Di Laut Arab (North Arabian Sea) seolah tidak ada tanah yang boleh digunakan untuk mengkebumikannya. Kenapa tidak diserahkan kepada ulama Pakistan sahaja untuk kerja pengkebumiannya?

Sebelum ini USA menyatakan telah membuktikan mayat Osama melalui pengenalan DNA. ??? Adakah keputusan pengkajian tersebut dapat diperolehi sekelip mata? Mengelirukan.

USA berkata jenazah Osama telah diuruskan mengikut hukum Islam. (???) Siapa pula yang mengkafan dan sembahyangkan jenazahnya? Bila pula jenazahnya dibawa ke Laut Utara Arab? Semua ini mengundang kontroversi terhadap kenyataan kematiannya. Mereka bimbang jika ada pihak yang meuntut jenazahnya atau mengesahkan bahawa mayat itu sememangnya bukan Osama.

Sejauh mana kita sebagai orang islam menerima kenyataan tersebut? Usah biarkan kita tertipu lagi sebagaimana kes 911 dahulu.

3 siri gambar ini telah lama beredar di internet, USA memang nakal

Semakin hari semakin ketara dusta yang diwayangkan. Banyak laman web terutama yang menentang NWO telah membuktikan gambar Osama yang ditunjukkan itu adalah palsu atau "fake". Ada laporan yang mengatakan bahawa Osama telah pun meninggal 10 tahun lalu akibat sakit buah pinggang.

Apakah yang sedang diusahakan oleh USA melalui penghebahan berita ini masih menjadi tanda tanya. Tentu ada agenda di sebaliknya. Seperti lazimnya setiap suatu yang disensasikan oleh USA mempunyai agenda tersembunyi.

Mungkinkah mereka merancang dan mengushakan keganasan (binaan CIA) di seluruh bumi Arab sebagai reaksi kematian Benladen kemudian akan menjadikanya alasan untuk menjarah seluruh negara Arab. Semua penentangan Arab terhadap USA akan dilabelkan sebai alQaeda dan pastinya akan dihapuskan walaupun terpaksa mencampuri urusan negara lain.

Bagi membuktikan alQaeda wujud, CIA merekrut pengganas dan menjadi penghasut seolah satu kebangkitan Islam, membangkitkan rasa benci terhadap USA. Dari sini USA akan mendapat restu PBB menyerang negara Islam.

Semua sumber berita mengenai Osama ini hanya dari USA, kebenarannya amatlah diragui walaupun mereka cuba sebaik cara mengaburi pemikiran awam. Sekurang-kurangnya mereka berjaya membohongi sebahagian penduduk dunia walaupun bukan semuanya. Malah ada yang bersorak gembira menyambut kematiannya termasuk Presiden Karzai (Afghanistan).

penonton TV di Iraq menyaksikan berita 

Obama mungkin akan terperangkap dengan helah yang cuba dimainkannya apabila pelbagai pihak termasuk rakyat USA sendiri meragui kebenaran berita tersebut. Tidak mustahil skrip sedang disusun untuk merealisasikan pembohongan ini. Pendustaan adalah mainan Washington untuk menjadi Raja Dunia.

"It's been kind of strange, the burial at sea, the very fast DNA…it's just been sort of, did this really happen or was this all concocted somehow? It would be reassuring in some sense if the photos were released." said Abigail Carter, whose husband Arron was killed in the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

IRAN JUGA MERAGUINYA


"Basically we do not know how much the press report is true," the head of Iranian Parliament National Security and Foreign Policy Commission said, adding that "but what is apparent is that Americans have used the issue (al-Qaida and bin Laden) as an excuse to step in Afghanistan," Alaeddin Boroujerdi told reporters on Monday.

Kita sorot kembali berita antara bangsa mengenai peristiwa ini.

WASHINGTON, May 2 -- Osama bin Laden was buried by the U.S. military at sea in accordance with the terror mastermind's own religious customs, as no country would accept his remains, a senior U.S. officials said Monday.

The burial was conducted aboard aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson in the North Arabian Sea, an official said on the conditions of anonymity during a background briefing with media. It took place within 24 hours of the al-Qaida leader's death, he said.

"Preparations for at-sea [burial] began at 1:10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (0510 GMT) and were completed at 2 a.m. (0600 GMT)," the official said.

"The body was placed in a weighted bag. A military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker," he added.

Afterward, bin Laden's body was placed onto a flat board, which was then elevated upward on one side and the body slid off into the sea.

CIA and Defense Department officials are sure it was the body of bin Laden. CIA specialists compared photos of the body with known photos of bin Laden and said with 95-percent certainty it was the terrorist leader, a senior intelligence official said.

In addition, the intelligence official said, bin Laden's wife identified him by name while the strike team was still in the compound.

Specialists "performed the initial DNA analysis matching a virtually 100-percent DNA match of the body against the DNA of several of bin Laden's family members."

John Brennan, Assistant to the President for homeland security and counterterrorism, also confirmed in a White House briefing the burial of bin Laden's remains "was done in strict conformance with Islamist precepts and practices."

"It was prepared in accordance with the Islamic requirements. We early on made provisions for that type of burial, and we wanted to make sure that it was going to be done, again, in strict conformance," said Brennan.

Osama bin Laden's burial was conducted aboard aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson in the North Arabian Sea in accordance with the terror mastermind's own religious customs, as no country would accept his remains, a senior U.S. officials said on May 2. (Xinhua/Wu Bin)

Egypt's Azhar slams Osama sea burial

heikh Ahmed al-Tayeb of Egypt's al-Azhar 

Grand Sheik of al-Azhar in Cairo, Ahmad al-Tayeb, has condemned the US measure to deposit the body of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden into the sea as a violation of Islamic laws.

The burial at sea “runs contrary to the principles of Islamic laws, religious values and humanitarian customs," al-Tayeb said in a statement. He said that the dead should be given full respect regardless of their nations or beliefs, adding that a corpse would be respected once it is buried. 

US President Barack Obama announced in a televised speech on Sunday that bin Laden was killed by US forces after he was found hiding in a compound in Pakistan. A senior US Defense official alleged that bin Laden's body has been buried at sea after the procedures for Islamic burial were followed on the deck of the USS Carl Vinson for one hour. He said that his body was washed and placed in a white sheet, then verses of the Qur'an were cited and the corpse was eased into the North Arabian Sea. The official added that finding a country willing to accept the remains of the world's most wanted man was difficult, so the US decided to bury him at sea.
This is while burial at sea is not an Islamic practice.

berita semalam 

Obama says al-Qaida leader killed in U.S. operation outside Islamabad

WASHINGTON, May 2 -- U.S. President Barack Obama on Sunday announced the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden almost 10 years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on U.S. soil that killed nearly 3,000 people. At the astonishing news, world leaders congratulated Obama of what they call a victory for all.

what is going on in Libya? Vampire wars and new Central Bank of Libya

The United States, Britain and NATO don’t care about bombing civilians to contain rebellion. Their militaries bomb civilians every day without mercy. They have destroyed most of the community infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan before turning their sights on Libya. So what’s really going on here?

According to the CIA, the following never happened…

Last October, US oil giants— Chevron and Occidental Petroleum— made a surprising decision to pull out of Libya, while China, Germany and Italy stayed on, signing major contracts with Gadhaffi’s government.  As the U.S. Asset who started negotiations for the Lockerbie Trial with Libyan diplomats, I had close ties to Libya’s U.N. Mission from 1995 to 2003. Given my long involvement in the Lockerbie saga, I have continued to enjoy special access to high level intelligence gossip on Libya.

Last summer that gossip got juicy!

About July, I started hearing that Gadhaffi was exerting heavy pressure on U.S. and British oil companies to cough up special fees and kick backs to cover the costs of Libya’s reimbursement to the families of Pan Am 103. Payment of damages for the Lockerbie bombing had been one of the chief conditions for ending U.N. sanctions on Libya that ran from 1992 until 2003. And of course the United Nations forced Gadhaffi to hand over two Libyan men for a special trial at The Hague, though everybody credible was fully conscious of Libya’s innocence in the Lockerbie affair. (Only ignorant politicians trying to score publicity points say otherwise.)

Knowing Gadhaffi as well as I do, I was convinced that he’d done it. He’d bided his time until he could extort compensation from U.S. oil companies. He’s a crafty bastard, extremely intelligent and canny. That’s exactly how he operates. And now he was taking his revenge. As expected, the U.S. was hopping mad about it. Gadhaffi wasn’t playing the game the way the Oil Bloodsuckers wanted. The Vampire of our age—the Oil Industry—roams the earth, sucking the life out of every nation to feed its thirst for profits. Only when they got to Libya, Gadhaffi took on the role of a modern-day Robin Hood, who insisted on replenishing his people for the costs they’d suffered under U.N. sanctions.

Backing up a year earlier, in August 2009 the lone Libyan convicted of the Lockerbie bombing that killed 270 people, Abdelbasset Megrahi, won a compassionate release from Scottish prison. Ostensibly, the British government and Scottish Courts granted Megrahi’s request to die at home with dignity from advance stage cancer—in exchange for dropping a legal appeal packed with embarrassments for the European Courts. The decision to free Megrahi followed shocking revelations of corruption at the special Court of The Hague that handled the Lockerbie Trial. Prosecution witnesses confessed to receiving payments of $4 million each from the United States, in exchange for testimony against Megrahi, a mind-blowing allegation of judicial corruption.

The Lockerbie conviction was full of holes to begin with. Anybody who knows anything about terrorism in the 1980s knows the CIA got mixed up in heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa Valley during the hostage crisis in Lebanon. The Lockerbie conspiracy had been a false flag operation to kill off a joint CIA and Defense Intelligence investigation into kick backs from Islamic Jihad, in exchange for protecting the heroin transit network.

According to my own CIA handler, Dr. Richard Fuisz, who’d been stationed in Lebanon and Syria at the time, the CIA had established a protected drug route from Lebanon to Europe and on to the United States. His statements support other sources that “Operation Corea” allowed Syrian drug dealers led by Monzer al-Kassar (also linked to Oliver North in the Iran-Contra scandal) to ship heroin to the U.S. ON Pan Am flights, in exchange for intelligence on the hostages’ whereabouts in Lebanon. The CIA allegedly made sure that suitcases carrying heroin were not searched at customs. Nicknamed the “Godfather of Terror,” Al Kassar is now serving a prison sentence for conspiring with Colombian drug cartels to assassinate U.S. nationals.

Building up to Lockerbie, the Defense Intelligence team in Beirut, led by Maj. Charles Dennis McKee and Matthew Gannon, suspected that CIA infiltration of the heroin network might be prolonging the hostage crisis. If so, the consequence was severe. AP Reporter Terry Anderson got chained in a basement for 7 years, while 96 other high profile western hostages suffered beatings, mock executions and overall trauma. McKee’s team raised the alarms in Washington that a CIA double agent profiting from the narco-dollars might be warning the hostage takers whenever their dragnet closed in. Washington sent a fact-finding team to Lebanon to gather evidence.

On the day it was blown out of the sky, Pan Am 103 was carrying that team of CIA and FBI investigators, the CIA’s Deputy Chief assigned to Beirut, and three Defense Intelligence officers, including McKee and Gannon, on their way to Washington to deliver a report on the CIA’s role in heroin trafficking, and the impact on terrorist financing and the hostage crisis. In short, everyone with direct knowledge of CIA kickbacks from heroin trafficking died on Pan Am 103. A suitcase packed with $500,000 worth of heroin was found in the wreckage. It belonged to investigators, as proof of the corruption.

The punch line was that the U.S. State Department issued an internal travel advisory, warning that government officials should get off that specific flight on that specific day, because Pan Am 103 was expected to get bombed. That’s right, folks! The U.S. had prior knowledge of the attack.

Unforgivably, nobody told Charles McKee or Matthew Gannon. But other military officials and diplomats got pulled off the flight—making room for a group of students from Syracuse University traveling stand by for the Christmas holidays.

It was a monstrous act!  But condemning Megrahi to cover up the CIA’s role in heroin trafficking has struck many Lockerbie afficiandos as grossly unjust. Add the corruption of purchased testimony– $4 million a pop— and Megrahi’s life sentence struck a nerve of obscenity.

It struck Gadhaffi as grievously offensive, as well—The United Nations had forced Libya to fork over $2.7 billion in damages to the Lockerbie families, a rate of $10 million for every death. Once it became clear the U.S. paid two key witnesses $4 million each to commit perjury, spook gossip throughout the summer was rife that Gadhaffi had taken bold action to demand compensation from U.S. (and probably British) oil corporations operating in Libya. More than likely, Libya’s demands for kick backs and compensation extended to other European oil conglomerates as well—particularly France and Italy—who are now spearheading attacks on Libya.

I knew last summer there would be trouble. Payback would be a b—tch on both sides. You don’t lock an innocent man in prison for 10 years on bogus charges of terrorism, and expect forgiveness. The United States and Britain had behaved with remarkable selfishness. You’ve got to admit that Gadhaffi’s attempt to balance the scales of justice demonstrated a flair of righteous nationalism.

Alas, Gadhaffi was playing with fire, no matter how justified his complaint. You don’t strike a tyrant without expecting a tyrant to strike back.

And that’s exactly what’s happening today.

Don’t kid yourself. This is an oil war, and it smacks of imperialist double standards. Two articles by Prof. Chossudovsky at the Global Research Centre are must reading: “Operation Libya and the Battle for Oil: Redrawing the Map of Africa” and Insurrection and Military Intervention: The US-NATO Attempted Coup d’Etat in Libya?

There is simply no justification for U.S. or NATO action against Libya. The U.N. charter acknowledges the rights of sovereign nations to put down rebellions against their own governments. Moreover, many observers have commented that plans for military intervention appear to have been much more advanced than U.S. and European leaders want to admit.

For myself, I know in my gut that war planning started months before the democratization movement kicked off throughout the Arab world—a lucky cover for U.S. and European oil policy. Perhaps too lucky.

As Chossudovsky writes, “Hundreds of US, British and French military advisers arrived in Cyrenaica, Libya’s eastern breakaway province” on February 23 and 24— seven (7) days after the start of Gadhaffi’s domestic rebellion. “The advisers, including intelligence officers, were dropped from warships and missile boats at the coastal towns of Benghazi and Tobruk.” (DEBKAfile, US military advisers in Cyrenaica, Feb. 25, 2011) Special forces on the ground in Eastern Libya provided covert support to the rebels.”  Eight British Special Forces commandos were arrested in the Benghazi region, while acting as military advisers to opposition forces, according to the Times of London.

We’re supposed to believe the United States, Britain and Europe planned, coordinated and executed a full military intervention in 7 short days— from the start of the Libyan rebellion in mid-February until military advisers appeared on the ground in Libya on February 23-24!

That’s strategically impossible.

Nothing can persuade me that Gadhaffi’s fate wasn’t decided months ago, when Chevron and Occidental Petroleum took their whining to Capitol Hill, complaining that Gadhaffi’s nationalism interfered with their oil profiteering. From that moment, military intervention was on the drawing board as surely as the Patriot Act got stuck in a drawer waiting for 9/11.

The message is simple: Challenge the oil corporations and your government and your people will pay the ultimate price: Give us your oil as cheaply as possible. Or die.

Don’t kid yourself.  Nobody gives a damn about suffering in Libya or Iraq. You don’t bomb a village to save it. The U.S., Britain and NATO are the bullies of the neighborhood. The enforcers for Big Oil.

Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan have something in common. They have vast and extraordinary oil and mineral riches. As such, they are all victims of what I call the Vampire Wars.

The Arab Princes get paid off, while the bloodsuckers pull the life blood out of the people. They’re scarcely able to survive in their own wealthy societies. The people and the domestic economy are kept alive to uphold the social order, but they are depleted of the nourishment of their own national wealth.

The democratization movements are sending a warning that I don’t think Big Oil, or their protectors in the U.S. and British governments understand or have figured out how to control. The Arab people are finished with this cycle of victimization. They’ve got their stakes out, and they’re starting to figure out how to strike into the heart of these Vampires, sucking the life blood out of their nations.

And woe to the wicked when they do!
Former U.S. Intelligence Asset, Susan Lindauer covered Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria/Hezbollah from 1993 to 2003. She is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq.

sumber

Wow That Was Fast! Libyan Rebels Have Already Established A New Central Bank Of Libya

The Economic Collapse

March 29, 2011 The rebels in Libya are in the middle of a life or death civil war and Moammar Gadhafi is still in power and yet somehow the Libyan rebels have had enough time to establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company. Perhaps when this conflict is over those rebels can become time management consultants. They sure do get a lot done. What a skilled bunch of rebels - they can fight a war during the day and draw up a new central bank and a new national oil company at night without any outside help whatsoever. If only the rest of us were so versatile! But isn't forming a central bank something that could be done after the civil war is over?  According to Bloomberg, the Transitional National Council has "designated the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and the appointment of a governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi." Apparently someone felt that it was very important to get pesky matters such as control of the banks and control of the money supply out of the way even before a new government is formed. Of course it is probably safe to assume that the new Central Bank of Libya will be 100% owned and 100% controlled by the newly liberated people of Libya, isn't it? Most people don't realize that the previous Central Bank of Libya was 100% state owned. The following is an excerpt from Wikipedia's article on the former Central Bank of Libya.... The Central Bank of Libya (CBL) is 100% state owned and represents the monetary authority in The Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and enjoys the status of autonomous corporate body. The law establishing the CBL stipulates that the objectives of the central bank shall be to maintain monetary stability in Libya , and to promote the sustained growth of the economy in accordance with the general economic policy of the state. Since the old Central Bank of Libya was state owned, it was essentially under the control of Moammar Gadhafi. But now that Libya is going to be "free", the new Central Bank of Libya will be run by Libyans and solely for the benefit of Libyans, right? Of course it is probably safe to assume that will be the case with the new national oil company as well, isn't it? Over the past couple of years, Moammar Gadhafi had threatened to nationalize the oil industry in Libya and kick western oil companies out of the country, but now that Libya will be "free" the people of Libya will be able to work hand in hand with "big oil" and this will create a better Libya for everyone. Right? Of course oil had absolutely nothing to do with why the U.S. "inva---" (scratch that) "initiated a kinetic humanitarian liberty action" in Libya. When Barack Obama looked straight into the camera and told the American people that the war in Libya is in the "strategic interest" of the United States, surely he was not referring to oil. After all, war for oil was a "Bush thing", right? The Democrats voted for Obama to end wars like this, right? Surely no prominent Democrats will publicly support this war in Libya, right? Surely Barack Obama will end the bombing of Libya if the international community begins to object, right? Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize. He wouldn't deeply upset the other major powers on the globe and bring us closer to World War III, would he? Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has loudly denounced "coalition strikes on columns of Gaddafi's forces" and he believes that the U.S. has badly violated the terms of the UN Security Council resolution.... "We consider that intervention by the coalition in what is essentially an internal civil war is not sanctioned by the U.N. Security Council resolution." So to cool off rising tensions with the rest of the world, Obama is going to call off the air strikes, right? Well, considering the fact that Obama has such vast foreign policy experience we should all be able to rest easy knowing that Obama will understand exactly what to do. Meanwhile, the rebels seem to be getting the hang of international trade already. They have even signed an oil deal with Qatar! Rebel "spokesman" Ali Tarhouni has announced that oil exports to Qatar will begin in "less than a week". Who knew that the rag tag group of rebels in Libya were also masters of banking and international trade? We sure do live in a strange world. Tonight, Barack Obama told the American people the following.... "Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different." So now we are going to police all of the atrocities in all of the other countries around the globe? The last time I checked, the government was gunning down protesters in Syria. Is it time to start warming up the Tomahawks? Or do we reserve "humanitarian interventions" only for those nations that have a lot of oil? In fact, atrocities are currently being committed all over Africa and in about a dozen different nations in the Middle East. Should we institute a draft so that we will have enough young men and women to police the world with? We all have to be ready to serve our country, right? The world is becoming a smaller place every day, and you never know where U.S. "strategic interests" are going to be threatened next. The rest of the world understands that we know best, right? Of course the rest of the world can surely see our good intentions in Libya, can't they? Tensions with Russia, China and the rest of the Arab world are certainly going to subside after they all see how selfless our "humanitarian intervention" has been in Libya, don't you think? In all seriousness, we now live in a world where nothing is stable anymore. Wars and revolutions are breaking out all over the globe, unprecedented natural disasters are happening with alarming frequency and the global economy is on the verge of total collapse. By interfering in Libya, we are just making things worse. Gadhafi is certainly a horrible dictator, but this was a fight for the Libyan people to sort out. We promised the rest of the world that we were only going to be setting up a "no fly zone". By violating the terms of the UN Security Council resolution, we have shown other nations that we cannot be trusted and by our actions we have increased tensions all over the globe. So what do all of you think about what is going on in Libya? sumber

Satanic Movement OBAMA BENLADEN: Access to Libyan oil rather than saving human lives

The speedy intervention by America, France and Britain in Libya in the name of UN Resolution in favour of ‘No Fly” Zone is nothing but an old imperialist goal. All these three nations are old imperialist powers who have colonized half the world during 19th and first half of 20th century, France and Britain directly and America indirectly. The cover of course was to ‘save ‘civilian lives though they themselves, along with their allies, have killed, in colonized countries civilians many more times be it in India, Algeria, Vietnam and several other countries.

They have also supported allies who are mostly dictators and keep on killing civilians as a matter of routine but none of them would protest even symbolically as it suits their vested interests. Israel virtually destroyed Lebanon and killed thousands of civilians but America not only did not protest, let alone stop Israel from doing that as it was in its interest. Their civilians, including women and children, all become ‘terrorists’ and worth killing and hence extend full cooperation to Israel.

When Israel was bombing Ghaza and destroying everything including residential houses and even hospitals killing the sick, women and children, America kept quiet along with Britain and France. As they were all worth killing to ‘protect’ Israel. People thought since Republican Party was ruling and Bush was the President, it was their ideology and hence they are doing it though it was not correct position. Whether president is Clinton, Bush or Obama it is the same story.

When Bush administration attacked Iraq telling lies that Saddam Hussein possesses ‘weapons of mass destruction’ blame was mainly on him and when Obama contested for Presidentship against the Republican candidate all of us thought he is a liberator and supported him emotionally and celebrated when he won. He was even awarded Noble Prize for peace for ‘opposing war’ in Afghanistan and Iraq. Did he deserve Noble? In fact no ruler should ever be given Noble as rulers are hardly motivated by ideals and values but by their own interests. However, Noble is known to be pro-establishment in its approach.

Obama, however, along with rulers of Britain and France justifies the attack on Libya by saying that the Arab League was also a party to the UN resolution and they urged for stopping bombing of civilians by Muammar Qaddafi. This is only technically true. The Arab League has changed its position now as it was embarrassed by such speedy and destructive invasion by three western countries.

The Arab League’s support had not much credibility even otherwise. Firstly, most of the member countries are ruled by those who are US supporters, monarchs and dictators. Secondly, these rulers themselves fear rebellion by their own masses and look towards America for support. Thus the Arab League support hardly had any legitimacy in the eyes of the Arab masses.

Let us point out here this author is no supporter of Qaddafi. He has ruled Libya with iron hands for last 41 years and must be toppled sooner than later. His own people had revolted against him and his bombing them also would not have stopped them from fighting against him. However, this intervention, by three countries, has given his rule some kind of legitimacy to perpetuate himself.

Now many Arabs will think it was indeed some kind of western conspiracy to topple him and control Libyan oil. Their sympathy now will be more with Qaddafi than otherwise. Qaddafi’s supporters will also fight bow with greater determination. In fact these western powers were in a hurry for armed intervention as they were not sure which way the rebels would go, They were uncertain especially because this was a democratic revolt against Qaddafi’s dictatorship. In that case they will have no Access to Libyan oil.

Cuba’s Fidel Castro has shown in his lucid article what is tempting for these western imperialists. The real motive, according to Castro, is oil reserves of Libya. He writes: “Total desert covers 95% of its (Libya’s) territory. Technology made it possible to find significant fields of excellent quality light oil, currently providing 800 billion barrels per day, and abundant natural gas deposits. Such wealth allowed it to achieve a life expectancy of close to 75 years and the highest per capita income in Africa. Its harsh desert is located above an enormous lake of fossil water, equivalent to more than three times the land surface of Cuba, which has made it possible to construct a broad network of fresh water pipes which extends throughout the country.”

Thus for America and other western countries who are greatly dependent on oil and gas reserves, there are enormous implications for controlling Libya’s natural resources. They cannot simply let them go. No wonder than the way speedily they have attacked Libya in the name of saving civilian lives. Their invasion has already killed several hundred and no one knows how long these operations will continue.

Qaddafi will not give up easily. He has already declared his intention to prepare for a long term fight. However, after the experience of Iraq and Afghanistan it may not be easy for peoples of America, England and France to support misadventure of their rulers. Moreover the lie that this intervention is for saving civilian lives will soon be out and people would know it is in fact for filling the rich coffers of oil giants rather than saving human lives. Then it will indeed be very difficult to sustain the fight.

Iraq and Afghanistan is very much on the minds of people and their support cannot be taken for granted. Russia, China, India and Brazil have refused to support US-England and France armed intervention in Libya and from Europe Germany also declined to join US led invasion. It has become obvious to the peoples of the world that America waits for some pretext to invade (behind cover of some higher cause) WHERE THERE IS OIL and where Israel’s interests are involved. Given these two factors, America will never hesitate to intervene.

Now there is one more factor involved: the peaceful movement against dictators and monarch’s to topple them and replace them with democratic alternative. This totally belies Prof. Samuel Huntington’s theory of clash of civilizations and that Islam is not at all compatible with democracy. The former theory was evolved to create new enemy – Islam- to replace communism which collapsed and the later to legitimize support for dictators and monarchs in the Arab world and both stood to the total advantage of America.

Osama’s terrorism – projected as Islamic terrorism for obvious reasons – reinforced these images of Islam and Muslims and if peaceful resistance to dictators and monarchs in the Arab world continues it will prove these theories i.e. Islam is terrorist religion and incompatible with democracy, will be proved wrong and would no longer provide False excuses to America for armed interventions this imposing its dominance over the area.

The American intervention in Libya has complex motives apart from oil politics. All remaining Arab dictators are looking at America to save them and terrorism is very much needed by them led by Osama to legitimize their rule. This democratic revolution in the Arab world is not only proving Osama wrong that violence and terrorism is the only way out but also giving these dictators sleepless nights. It is totally knocking off their feet all political legitimacy.

The Arab masses are quite hopeful today that the other world is possible and possible quite peaceful and democratically. But western powers want to prove them wrong and prove Osama right. In fact America needs Osama and Osama needs America. They have become each others mirror image.

Asghar Ali  - http://www.ummid.com