Tora Bora 15 Disember 2001

Akhirnya, terbukti Obama mempunyai agenda tertentu dengan mengisytiharkan pembunuhan Osama. Siapakah yang dibunuh oleh tenteran Amerika pada 1 Mei 2011 yang lalu amat menarik uantuk difikirkan kerana Osama telah lama meninggal dunia. Semakin menghairankan berita ini (sebenarnya) telah disenyapkan dan tidak diulas oleh mana-mana akhbar utama antarabangsa termasuk di negara kita.

Pada tarikh 16 Disember, 2001 Osama Bin Ladin dilaporkan telah meninggal dunia dan dikebumikan di Tora Bora. Ia disiarkan oleh beberapa akhbar di Mesir dan Pakistan. Beliau mengalami penderitaan konpilasi paru-paru yang kronik dan meninggal dalam keadaan biasa dan aman. Ia disaksikan oleh beberapa ahli keluarga, rakan dan pejuang.

Adalah sukar untuk mengesan kuburannya kerana ia dikebumikankan mengikut tradisi Wahabbi yang tidak membenarkan tanda pada setiap kuburan. Secara amnya, sukar untuk dibuktikan bahawa Osama telah meninggal dunia dan ini memberi kesempatan kepada caturan baru USA-Zeo.

USA-Zeo membuat duplikasi Osama (seorang ejen CIA) dan mempergunakan watak ini sebagai manusia yang amat ganas dan menjadi perancang kerja sabotaj ke atas kepentingan USA sebagaimana dakwaan palsu peristiwa 911. Warga USA dengan mudah diperdaya sekaligus menyokong usaha Presidennya melaksanakan kerja membalas dendam ke atas Afghanistan dan seluruh umat Islam.

Sekaligus membuka peluang kepada gerakan Jesuits memburukkan agama Islam keseluruhannya sebagai agama yang ganas dan agama suci ini didakwa mempunyai elemen pengganas. Melalui kempen yang berterusan, ramai Muslimin yang tidak kuat imannya tergelincir ke dalam perangkap mereka.

Selanjutnya, Gerakan Kristianisasi sebagai cabang gerak halus Jesuits pula mengambil giliran mengkristiankan seramai mungkin orang Islam yang sebelum ini amat liat untuk dimurtadkan. Indonesia menjadi negara yang paling malang terjebak dalam gerakan mereka dan kini Malaysia pula sedang digempur.

Cuba teliti maklumat yang dibongkar oleh Global Research di bawah:

Global research Editor's Note

The translation from the Arabic has been verified on behalf of Global Research. This funeral announcement was published in the December 26 2001 edition of Al Wafd

Translation of Funeral Article in Egyptian Newspaper:
Al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633 

News of Bin Laden's Death and Funeral 10 days ago 

Islamabad. A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa'da organization, stating that bin Laden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, stated to The Observer of Pakistan that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial in Tora Bora 10 days ago. He mentioned that 30 of al-Qa'da fighters attended the burial as well as members of his family and some friends from the Taleban. In the farewell ceremony to his final rest guns were fired in the air.

The official stated that it is difficult to pinpoint the burial location of bin Laden because according to the Wahhabi tradition no mark is left by the grave. He stressed that it is unlikely that the American forces would ever uncover any traces of bin Laden. 

Ilusi Berjaya Dicipta

Dalam satu kajian yang dibuat oleh beberapa penganalisa konpirasi USA-Zeo menunjukkan alQaeda adalah rekaan semata-mata berasaskan satu nama database yang dipanggil al qaidat (kaedah) dan watak Usama pula dihidupkan kembali dan ditempatkan di Pakistan sebagai ejen CIA untuk memerangi Taliban di Afghanistan dan Pakistan. Semua ini adalah mainan politik Amerika-Zeo untuk mewujudkan sesuatu sebab untuk membolehkan sesuatu tindakan diambil ke atas sesuatu sasaran sepertimana Afghabistan, Iraq dan sekarang Libya serta Syria dan Pakistan di masa akan datang.

Malangnya semua negara ini adalah negara Islam. Bolehlah disimpulkan bahawa USA-Zeo ini adalah penyamaran Dajjal Laknatullah melaksanakan fitnah. Kita tunggu berita dari Isfahan, Iran. Kenapa? Cubalah fikirkan.

In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.


The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy.

According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.

September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

Real Al Qaeda & Osama bin Laden

Al Qaeda just a database and Osama is CIA agent in Afghabistan, thats all.....

Al Qaeda: A CIA Database | Not A Terrorist Group

 

True Story: Al Qaeda & Osama

“In the mid-1980s, Al Qaida was a database located in computer and dedicated to the communications of the Islamic Conference’s secretariat.

“In the early 1990s, I was a military intelligence officer in the Headquarters of the French Rapid Action Force. Because of my skills in Arabic my job was also to translate a lot of faxes and letters seized or intercepted by our intelligence services . . . We often got intercepted material sent by Islamic networks operating from the UK or from Belgium.

“These documents contained directions sent to Islamic armed groups in Algeria or in France. The messages quoted the sources of statements to be exploited in the redaction of the tracts or leaflets, or to be introduced in video or tapes to be sent to the media. The most commonly quoted sources were the United Nations, the non-aligned countries, the UNHCR and . . . Al Qaida.

“Because of the presence of ‘rogue states,’ it became easy for terrorist groups to use the email of the database. Hence, the email of Al Qaida was used, with some interface system, providing secrecy, for the families of the mujaheddin to keep links with their children undergoing training in Afghanistan, or in Libya or in the Beqaa valley, Lebanon. Or in action anywhere in the battlefields where the extremists sponsored by all the ‘rogue states’ used to fight. And the ‘rogue states’ included Saudi Arabia. When Osama bin Laden was an American agent in Afghanistan, the Al Qaida Intranet was a good communication system through coded or covert messages.

Meet “Al Qaeda”

“Al Qaida was neither a terrorist group nor Osama bin Laden’s personal property . . . The terrorist actions in Turkey in 2003 were carried out by Turks and the motives were local and not international, unified, or joint. These crimes put the Turkish government in a difficult position vis-a-vis the British and the Israelis. But the attacks certainly intended to ‘punish’ Prime Minister Erdogan for being a ‘toot tepid’ Islamic politician.

” . . . In the Third World the general opinion is that the countries using weapons of mass destruction for economic purposes in the service of imperialism are in fact ‘rogue states,” specially the US and other NATO countries.

” Some Islamic economic lobbies are conducting a war against the ‘liberal” economic lobbies. They use local terrorist groups claiming to act on behalf of Al Qaida. On the other hand, national armies invade independent countries under the aegis of the UN Security Council and carry out pre-emptive wars. And the real sponsors of these wars are not governments but the lobbies concealed behind them.

“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the ‘TV watcher’ to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money.”

In yet another example of what happens to those who challenge the system, in December 2001, Maj. Pierre-Henri Bunel was convicted by a secret French military court of passing classified documents that identified potential NATO bombing targets in Serbia to a Serbian agent during the Kosovo war in 1998. Bunel’s case was transferred from a civilian court to keep the details of the case classified. Bunel’s character witnesses and psychologists notwithstanding, the system “got him” for telling the truth about Al Qaeda and who has actually been behind the terrorist attacks commonly blamed on that group. It is noteworthy that that Yugoslav government, the government with whom Bunel was asserted by the French government to have shared information, claimed that Albanian and Bosnian guerrillas in the Balkans were being backed by elements of “Al Qaeda.” We now know that these guerrillas were being backed by money provided by the Bosnian Defense Fund, an entity established as a special fund at Bush-influenced Riggs Bank and directed by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith.

source: truth11

ANOTHER FAKED PHOTO

 Osama Bin Laden

ANOTHER FAKED PHOTO HITS THE PRESS! 

Taking a bullet for your husband and agreeing to live in a cave for him are surely the biggest gestures of love a woman can make.

But these are just days in the life of the wife of Osama bin Laden who - until Monday - was America's most wanted terrorist.

Amal Ahmed Abdul Fatah - thought to be Bin Laden's fifth and final wife - was shot in the calf when she charged at the Navy SEALs who stormed the room she had been living in with her husband for the last five years.

As Pakistani authorities took hold of the woman and her young daughter Safiyah, they hoped that questioning her could provide intricate details into the life of America's most hated enemy.

Take a close look at the fingers in the DailyMail photo of the passport. This is another photoshop creation and a very clumsy one at that. The face seems to be an overlay as well and not part of the actual image of the passport.

UPDATE: No sooner had I posted this expose' than the Daily Mail closed commenting for the article. I wonder if they will delete or try to replace their original image.

Claims: The wife of Osama Bin Laden, Amal al-Sadah, says she lived 
with her husband in the same room for the past five years

Home: She lived with her husband and their children in a room in this
compound for the last five years undetected

Iranian Intelligence Minister Heidar Moslehi said Tehran has evidence that al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden had died of disease long before the United States' alleged raid on the terrorist, FARS Iranian news agency said.

Bin Laden was killed on May 2 in the Pakistani town of Abbottabad, north of the capital Islamabad, during a raid by U.S. Navy Seals.

"We have accurate information that bin Laden died of illness some time ago," Moslehi said.

Bin Laden's body was buried at sea less than 24 hours after the operation.

"If the US military and intelligence apparatus have really arrested or killed bin Laden, why don't they show him (his dead body) why have they thrown his corpse into the sea?" Moslehi continued.

A DNA test proved that the corpse of the dead man belonged to bin Laden, who has topped the FBI's most wanted list for the past decade.

White House spokesman, Jay Carney said on Wednesday that Washington would not release bin Laden's postmortem photos to avoid instigating propaganda and possible violence.

MOSCOW, May 9 (RIA Novosti)

Komen saya:

Kenapa warga Yaman ini dikatakan isteri Osama masih menjadi persoalan setelah pengumuman kematian Osama dipertikai oleh pelbagai pihak. Sudah sampai masanya kita membuka minda meneliti setiap berita yang dipersembahkan terutama dari USA.

Cerita yang kita dengar amatlah disangsikan dan diyakini ia mempunyai muslihat untuk tindakan mereka pada masa hadapan. Mengapa begitu berbelit-belit dan rumit? Dari awal lagi nampak segalanya macan ada yang tidak kena. Saya yakin bukan Osama yang menjadi korban pada hari itu tetapi mangsa yang sengaja dipilih untuk membuka ruang yang lebih lebar untuk USA menipu dunia. Tentu sekali ia ada kaitan dengan Yaman Syria dan Libya.

“Wahai orang-orang yang beriman, jika datang kepada kalian orang Fasik dengan membawa berita, maka telitilah berita itu agar kalian tidak memberikan keputusan pada suatu kaum tanpa pengetahuan sehingga kalian akan menyesali diri atas apa yang telah kalian kerjakan” |Qs Al Hujurat: 6|

EMAS - Libyan Gold Dinar Currency

The Gold Dinar: Saving the world economy from Gaddafi

Some believe it is about protecting civilians, others say it is about oil, but some are convinced intervention in Libya is all about Gaddafi’s plan to introduce the gold dinar, a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth.

“It’s one of these things that you have to plan almost in secret, because as soon as you say you’re going to change over from the dollar to something else, you’re going to be targeted,” says Ministry of Peace founder Dr James Thring. “There were two conferences on this, in 1986 and 2000, organized by Gaddafi. Everybody was interested, most countries in Africa were keen.”

Gaddafi did not give up. In the months leading up to the military intervention, he called on African and Muslim nations to join together to create this new currency that would rival the dollar and euro. They would sell oil and other resources around the world only for gold dinars.

It is an idea that would shift the economic balance of the world.

A country’s wealth would depend on how much gold it had and not how many dollars it traded. And Libya has 144 tons of gold. The UK, for example, has twice as much, but ten times the population.

“If Gaddafi had an intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling on the global market and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold dinar currency, any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks,” says Anthony Wile, founder and chief editor of the Daily Bell.

“So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and the need for other reasons to be brought forward from moving him from power.”

And it has happened before.

In 2000, Saddam Hussein announced Iraqi oil would be traded in euros, not dollars. Some say sanctions and an invasion followed because the Americans were desperate to prevent OPEC from transferring oil trading in all its member countries to the euro.

A gold dinar would have had serious consequences for the world financial system, but may also have empowered the people of Africa, something black activists say the US wants to avoid at all costs.

“The US have denied self-determination to Africans inside the US, so we are not surprised by anything the US would do to hinder the self-determination of Africans on the continent,” says Cynthia Ann McKinney, a former US Congresswoman.

The UK’s gold is kept in a secure vault somewhere in the depths of the Bank of England. As in most developed countries, there is not enough to go around.

But that is not the case in countries like Libya and many of the Gulf States.
A gold dinar would have given oil-rich African and Middle Eastern countries the power to turn around to their energy-hungry customers and say: “Sorry, the price has gone up, and we want gold.”

Some say the US and its NATO allies literally could not afford to let that happen.

 http://rt.com/news/economy-oil-gold-libya/

Libyan bombings sidelined by Bin Laden death news

Osama Bin Laden's death effectively buried the news of the NATO air strike on Colonel Gaddafi’s compound in Bab Azaziya, Libya, which killed his 29-year-old son, Saif al-Arab, and three grandchildren. They were buried in Tripoli on Monday.

All the children were said to be under 12 years old.­ The funeral was attended by several thousand people, AP reports.

But within 24 hours after the air strike, the US president announced the death of the world's most wanted terrorist – news which overshadowed anything coming from Libya.

“The idea of extrajudicial assassinations, just days after NATO attempted to assassinate Gaddafi and ended up killing his son and grandchildren – once again, we see another type of extrajudicial assassination going on, which, of course, is an international war crime,” says James Corbett, editor of the Corbett Report. “But in this case it's ok, because it's a boogeyman everyone loves to hate.”

The Coalition commanders have protested they are in full compliance with the UN Security Council resolution on Libya and only target military objects, insisting they are not targeting any person in particular. However, two recent air strikes were targeting the known whereabouts of Gaddafi.

“This was an attack on civilian structure. This was Gaddafi’s personal compound. They murdered three of his grandchildren [and] one of his sons,” Stephen Lendman, a radio host and author, told RT. “The idea is to kill him. It was a war crime. But of course, being in Libya at all is a war crime. All of the complicit NATO countries are committing war crimes every single day, attacking civilian targets, killing civilians.”

The bombings sparked riots, with Gaddafi supporters storming the Italian and British embassies in protest. Some believe, should the Coalition forces continue on their chosen course in Libya, the situation will go from bad to worse.

“NATO’s activities have only strengthened the loyalty and resolve of Gaddafi supporters,” independent journalist Moe Seager explained. “For each bomb that’s dropped on Tripoli and other Gaddafi loyalists’ strongholds, it’s just the psychology of war anywhere: when you bomb a resisting group, the resolve gets stronger.”

And as history shows, the situation in Libya may follow a course already familiar to Western politicians.

“We have to give full credit to the US political establishment and the military establishment that have been always very creative in finding enemies,” a director at Project for Pakistan in the 21st Century, Ahmed Quraishi, told RT. “First, it was the Soviet Union, then it was the Russian Federation, then Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and now of course we have Muammar Gaddafi, and the next one will come most definitely when the need arises.”

Moscow has expressed concern over the situation in Libya numerous times, saying the Coalition is using excessive force. But protests from Russia, India and China, just to name a few, have been ignored by the West, and while NATO decides on its ultimate goal, no one knows how many more lives will be lost.

DUSTA TERBARU

Al-Qaida Ada Nuklear?  WikiLeaks?

 Muslihat apakah ini? 

Tidak cukupkah membohongi dunia dengan peristiwa 9/11? Kegilaan USA semakin menjadi-jadi selepas kemaruk minyak Arab kini membuka dusta baru untuk mengharuskan nyawa orang Islam. Bukankah Osama itu adalah watak ciptaan CIA sendiri? 

 Sesuatu yang tidak masuk akal sama sekali. Apa yang menghairankan ramai juga yang terpedaya dengan pembohongan sebegini. USA sememangnya Raja Pendusta. Mewajarkan tahanan Guantanamo dan serangan terhadap negara islam. 

Laporan WikiLeaks: Kelompok pejuang al-Qaida mendakwa memiliki senjata nuklear dan tidak ragu-ragu menggunakannya jika pemimpin mereka, Osama bin Ladin ditangkap atau dibunuh oleh Amerika Syarikat. Belum diketahui persis di mana senjata nuklear al-Qaida disimpan, tetapi dilaporkan berada di Eropah.

Hal ini diungkapkan oleh hasil interogasi terhadap tahanan al Qaida di Guantanamo yang membocorkan data rahasia di laman web pembocor, WikiLeaks, seperti yang dilaporkan oleh surat kabar The Telegraph, Isnin ini, 25 April 2011.

Berita pengganas nuklear al-Qaida ini disampaikan oleh Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, komandan operasional al-Qaida yang ditahan di Guantanamo dan akan diadili tahun ini atas peranannya sebagai dalang serangan 11 September 2001. Dia mengatakan mereka memiliki fasiliti nuklear yang tersembunyi di suatu tempat di Eropah.

Mohammed mengatakan bahawa nuklear itu akan meledak jika Osama bin Ladin ditangkap atau dibunuh. Dia menjelaskan al-Qaida akan melancarkan serangan "neraka nuklear" ke seluruh dunia jika hal itu terjadi.

Ini bukan ancaman kosong, menurut dokumen WikiLeaks, intelijen AS telah mengungkapkan pembelian percobaan bahan baku nuklear oleh al-Qaida. Diperkirakan kelompok militan ini juga memiliki uranium, bahan utama dari tenaga nuklear.

Mohammed juga mengungkapkan al-Qaida telah merancang serangan besar-besaran di negara-negara besar di Asia, Afrika, Amerika Syarikat, dan Britain. Sebagian besar perencana serangan kini menjadi tahanan di Guantanamo.

sumber


Berhati-hatilah atas berita ini, USA sudah bersedia melancarkan NUKLEAR keatas sasaran (mungkin negaranya sendiri) untuk memulakan perang nuklear dan menghapuskan sebilangan besar penduduk dunia. Al-Qaeda akan dipersalahkan. Mereka terus merancang dan membuat pembohongan demi pembohongan. Mererka sediakan maklumat palsu untuk melaksanakan operasi sulit yang telah mereka rancangkan.

Libya: Privatization of their Central Bank and the Theft of their Nationalized Oil Profits

Posted on March 29, 2011 by willyloman

"The rebels in Libya are in the middle of a life or death civil war and Moammar Gadhafi is still in power and yet somehow the Libyan rebels have had enough time to establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company"

There is no question anymore as to why the Obama administration is attempting to impose a change of the regime of Libya.

On March 17th I wrote about the invasion of Libya being about two main objectives: privatizing the national oil company and the state-owned central banking system. I pointed out that the US and British inserted language in the UN resolution that allowed them to freeze the accounts of the nationalized oil company as well as the central bank of Libya. Well, before they have even won their coup, the CIA backed pro-west opposition has taken the time to announce that they have formed a new national oil company and central bank. Obviously they have allowed our neo-liberal economic hit-men to write-up the legal documentation for this action and I am sure it hands over control to multinationals outside Libya. This is why so many globalist apologists and neo-liberals have been running around the last week claiming that the real government in Libya is the Transitional National Council.

It has always been about gaining control of the central banking system in Libya. Oil is just a profitable side issue like every other state asset that is waiting in Libya to be privatized and sold off to multinational corporations like Bechtel, GE, and Goldman Sachs. Oil is important and it is certainly a target but it isn’t the driving force behind these global wars for profit. Banking is.

Once the Coalition Provisional Authority took over in Iraq, the second thing they did, after signing a law banning the Baathists and disbanding the military, was to sign over the state-owned central banking system to privately held banking interests, bringing Iraq online with the web of private central banks. That took place the very first day of the CPA’s control of Iraq.

“United Nations resolution 1483 transferred the authority to authorize expenditures from Iraq’s oil revenue from the United Nations to the Coalition Provisional Authority… The International Advisory and Monitoring Board consisted of senior financial experts from the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank...

… After the U.S. military came in and took over Iraq, the CPA quickly began issuing many binding orders privatizing Iraq’s economy and opening it up to foreign investment. This was welcomed by many multinational corporations who saw the war as an opportunity to make billions of dollars in profits.“ Wiki

If you control the issuance of money in a country and can turn huge profits while enslaving the population with the debt that it produces, then everything, everything including the oil and everything else, belongs to you.

“You control the debt, you control everything. This is the very nature of banking. To make us all, whether it is a nation or an individual, slaves to debt.” The International

That is why control of the central bank was far more important than the oil in Iraq or in Libya.

“The rebels in Libya are in the middle of a life or death civil war and Moammar Gadhafi is still in power and yet somehow the Libyan rebels have had enough time to establish a new Central Bank of Libya and form a new national oil company.

… According to Bloomberg, the Transitional National Council has “designated the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and the appointment of a governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi.” Apparently someone felt that it was very important to get pesky matters such as control of the banks and control of the money supply out of the way even before a new government is formed.” The Economic Collapse

The UN security council resolution was passed on the 17th of March late in the day. I wrote about it the very same night. According to the statement released by the “new government” of Libya, they met and hashed out the details of their new oil company and central bank system on the 19th, not 48 hours after the UN resolution promised ONLY to provide an no-fly zone over Libya for “humanitarian purposes”.

More than anything else, this new disclosure from the “new government” of Libya proves that this was NEVER about protecting the civilians, it was ALWAYS about stealing from them control of their monetary system and the nationalized oil profits that provide them with health-care, education, and even cash put right into each and every Libyan bank account as their part of the profits derived from a natural resource that belongs to them.

“The Transitional National Council released a statement announcing thedecision made at a March 19 meeting to establish the “Libyan Oil Company as supervisory authority on oil production and policies in the country, based temporarily in Benghazi, and the appointment of an interim director general” of the company.

The Council also said it “designated the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and the appointment of a governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi.”

The Security Council adopted a resolution on March 17 that froze the foreign assets of the Libyan National Oil Corp. and the Central Bank of Libya, both described in the text as “a potential source of funding” for Qaddafi’s regime.” Bloomberg

Obama prevented no humanitarian catastrophe, he saved not one single life. What he has done is not in service to the people of Libya but rather those who he serves, the banking interests that put him in power in the first place. In Libya, Obama’s intervention was not designed to protect the people but to ensure that they too are enslaved just as we are enslaved. That is why a waitress at the hotel the press corp was staying at called Eman a traitor. They know what is at stake here just like most American liberals know. But to them it is more important to maintain the shared illusion in the face of a crumbling liberal ideology that is literally rotting from the inside.

What is happening in Libya will hurt the people of Libya, not help them. It will steal from them their health-care and their education. It will return them to a time before Gadhafi when they had an literacy rate of only 10% and sky-rocketing poverty. It will impose upon them the same crippling banking structure that the people of this country know altogether too well. There is no question anymore, there is no argument. The only question is how much damage will we allow our corrupt government to inflict on the rest of the world before we stand up and say enough. That is the only question that is left and the only question worth discussing.

Are we as morally bankrupt as the phonies who run our country or not? 
 It’s just that simple.

“Give me your hungry, your tired, your poor, I’ll piss on em

that’s what the Statue of Bigotry says

Your poor huddled masses, let’s club em to death

get it over with and dump them on the boulevard” Lou Reed

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/
Regime Change Libya: Privatization of their Central Bank and the Theft of their Nationalized Oil Profits


peoples said:
Jan, on March 29, 2011 at 9:51 am said:

It is amazing that these so called UN Humanitarian States have frozen and stolen Libyan national money……. when the UN knows that the money is also used for the welfare of so many Libyans…. so in fact the UN is trying to starve Libyans….. is that a humanitarian thing to do? NO. The UN and neo-vampires are stealing a nations assets. What amazes me even more is that other Muslim nations are just sitting by and allowing it.
It’s like the devil is standing up in full view and mocking all religions……
and all news about Gaddafi has been blocked? We don’t know what is really going on. Even al Jazeera has turned pro-western since the devil-faced Hilliary complained about them not posting the same dis-info as our regular puppet media. Guess everything can be bought off.
fuck you , al Jazeera.

willyloman, on March 29, 2011 at 10:17 am said:

Pure unadulterated bullshit coming from al Jazeera…

1. “Fortunately, the Council wasn’t made-in-the-USA or manufactured by another foreign power. Rather it came into existence, a month ago, at Libyans’ own initiative, soon after the winds of revolutionary change blew Libya’s way, and after its people rose to the occasion with pride and courage.”

   http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/2011/03/2011328194855872276.html

   Indeed several of the members of that council, the ones who have been named publicly, DO INDEED have US ties and one even lived in the United States in the heart of Pentagon/CIA land (northern VA)

   Today’s disclosure shows how the council is actively setting up the oil profits and the central bank to be bought up by US and British multinationals. So al Jazeera is complete and utter propaganda. period.

   dennis, on March 29, 2011 at 10:23 am said:

   re: “The only question is how much damage will we allow our corrupt government to inflict on the rest of the world before we stand up and say enough.” what do you make of this peace group’s planned demonstration?http://nationalpeaceconference.org/
   as i see it, the israel plank will alienate most every jew in nyc (intentional?) and the wikileaks segment shows naiveté at best. also, there’s no mention of 9/11 as is par for the course for peace groups. i had a conversation with graeme macqueen over the weekend (at the buildingwhat? conference at the university of hartford, which went wellhttp://www.investigatebuilding7.org/). graeme said that in the anti-war groups to which he belongs, people see him as a kook for his 9/11 truth views and 9/11 truth activism. given that 9/11 was used as one of the alleged justifications for invading (and keeping us in) iraq, it’s so odd that the peace groups denigrate 9/11 truth, wouldn’t you say?

   
   

   
   

Libya - the rebirth of colonialism

The New Colonialism: Washington's Pursuit of World Hegemony

 "Gaddafi got himself targeted by standing up to Western imperialism. He refused to be part of the US Africa Command (AFRICOM). Gaddafi saw Washington’s scheme for what it is, a colonialist’s plan to divide and conquer"

What we are observing in Libya is the rebirth of colonialism. Only this time it is not individual European governments competing for empires and resources. The new colonialism operates under the cover of “the world community,” which means NATO and those countries that cooperate with it. NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was once a defense alliance against a possible Soviet invasion of Western Europe. Today NATO provides European troops in behalf of American hegemony.

Washington pursues world hegemony under the guises of selective “humanitarian intervention” and “bringing freedom and democracy to oppressed peoples.” On an opportunistic basis, Washington targets countries for intervention that are not its “international partners.” Caught off guard, perhaps, by popular revolts in Tunisia and Egypt, there are some indications that Washington responded opportunistically and encouraged the uprising in Libya. Khalifa Hifter, a suspected Libyan CIA asset for the last 20 years, has gone back to Libya to head the rebel army.

Gaddafi got himself targeted by standing up to Western imperialism. He refused to be part of the US Africa Command. Gaddafi saw Washington’s scheme for what it is, a colonialist’s plan to divide and conquer.

The US Africa Command (AFRICOM) was created by order of President George W. Bush in 2007. AFRICOM describes its objective:

“Our approach is based upon supporting U.S. national security interests in Africa as articulated by the President and Secretaries of State and Defense in the National Security Strategy and the National Military Strategy. The United States and African nations have strong mutual interests in promoting security and stability on the continent of Africa, its island states, and maritime zones. Advancing these interests requires a unified approach that integrates efforts with those of other U.S. government departments and agencies, as well as our African and other international partners.”

Forty-nine countries participate in the US Africa Command, but not Libya, Sudan, Eritrea, Zimbabwe, and Ivory Coast. There is Western military intervention in these non-member countries except for Zimbabwe.
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23940

One traditional means by which the US influences and controls a country is by training its military and government officers. The program is called International Military and Education Training (IMET). AFRICOM reports that “in 2009 approximately 900 military and civilian students from 44 African countries received education and training in the United States or their own countries. Many officers and enlisted IMET graduates go on to fill key positions in their militaries and governments.”

AFRICOM lists as a key strategic objective the defeat of the “Al-Qaeda network.” The US Trans Sahara Counter Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) trains and equips “partner nation forces “ to preclude terrorists from establishing sanctuaries and aims to “ultimately defeat violent extremist organizations in the region.”

Apparently, after ten years of “the war on terror” an omnipotent al-Qaeda now ranges across Algeria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Tunisia in Africa, across the Middle East, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the UK and is such a threat within the United States itself as to require a $56 billion “Homeland Security” annual budget.

The al-Qaeda threat, a hoax as likely as not, has become Washington’s best excuse for intervening in the domestic affairs of other countries and for subverting American civil liberties.

Sixty-six years after the end of World War II and 20 years after the Collapse of the Soviet Union, the US still has an European Command, one of nine military commands and six regional commands.

No other country feels a need for a world military presence. Why does Washington think that it is a good allocation of scarce resources to devote $1.1 trillion annually to military and security “needs”? Is this a sign of Washington’s paranoia? Is it a sign that only Washington has enemies?

Or is it an indication that Washington assigns the highest value to empire and squanders taxpayers’ monies and the country’s credit-worthiness on military footprints, while millions of Americans lose their homes and their jobs?

Washington’s expensive failures in Iraq and Afghanistan have not tempered the empire ambition. Washington can continue to rely on the print and TV media to cover up its failures and to hide its agendas, but expensive failures will remain expensive failures. Sooner or later Washington will have to acknowledge that the pursuit of empire has bankrupted the country.

It is paradoxical that Washington and its European “partners” are seeking to extend control over foreign lands abroad while immigration transforms their cultures and ethnic compositions at home. As Hispanics, Asians, Africans, and Muslims of various ethnicities become a larger and larger percentage of the populations of the “First World,” support for the white man’s empire fades away. Peoples desiring education and in need of food, shelter, and medical care will be hostile to maintaining military outposts in the countries of their origins.

Who exactly is occupying whom?

Parts of the US are reverting to Mexico. For example, demographer Steve Murdock, a former director of the US Census Bureau, reports that two-thirds of Texas children are Hispanics and concludes: “It’s basically over for Anglos.”

Ironic, isn’t it, while Washington and its NATO puppets are busy occupying the world, they are being occupied by the world.

Global Research Articles by Paul Craig Roberts

from africom centre
NATO takes over multilateral operations in Libya
WASHINGTON, D.C., 
Apr 1, 2011 — U.S. aircraft will remain on standby as NATO takes over multilateral operations in Libya and the coalition considers its future role there, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates told a Senate committee March 31, 2011.

U.S. military aircraft are still available to NATO in the next few days until the organization formally takes control of military operations over Libya, Gates told the Senate Armed Services Committee. After that, the U.S. fighter jets will remain on standby in case they are needed again, he said.

Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, earlier appeared before the House Armed Services Committee in what was a full day of testimony about the U.S. role in Libya.

Coalition forces had to halt air operations over Libya due to bad weather for the past two days, causing rebel forces to retreat from areas they'd gained since operations began March 19, Mullen said.

Gates described the U.S. military mission in Libya as an emergency prompted by Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's intent to use his military against civilians protesting for his ouster. Without intervention, he said, the situation would have led to thousands of deaths, hundreds of thousands of refugees and destabilization across North Africa.

"That part of our mission is complete and successful," Gates said.

More than 20 nations, including several Arab countries, are participating in the NATO coalition -- some publicly, some not -- in different ways to enforce U.N. Resolution 1973 that allows for the no-fly zone, Mullen said. The coalition, he said, was able to move fast to prevent a disaster because of U.S. relations with those European and Middle Eastern nations.

Nota Tambahan:

Pendapat seorang pengulas artikel WW3 pada 3 Fab, 2011 pada masa ini krisis di Libya belum berlaku. Memang ada kewajarannya pandangan beliau.

kita tunggu dan lihat peristiwa yang menghala ke arah huru-hara dunia...bukan minta...tapi sudah tertulis dalam al-Quran dan hadis...

sekarang huru-hara di Mesir..berkemungkinan besar merebak ke Algeria dan kawasan yang berhampiran dengan Israel..Sistem dajal telah menggerakkan semua tenteranya dengan cukup teliti dan rapi sesuai dengan lambang jangka lukis pada lambang freemason tu...sama-samalah kita berdoa semoga saudara kita di sana dapat menangani kemaraan tentera Dajjal...

pada hipotesis saya, sekarang sistem Dajjal ini sudah hampir kemuncaknya...hanya menunggu masa yang sesuai...walaupun nak mengambil masa beberapa tahun..tetapi masa berlalu begitu pantas tanpa kita sedari..

benar seperti sabda nabi..di akhir zaman nanti masa akan melipat waktu..sistem DAjjal sudah masuk dalam setiap sudut baik dari ekonomi..politik,ketenteraan,sains dan sosial...penaklukannya sudah berada pada fasa ke-3..

sabda nabi..Dajjal akan memerintah 40hari...1 hari bagaikan setahun (British)..1 Hari bagaikan sebulan (Amerika)....1 hari bagaikan seminggu (Israel)..dan selebihnya adalah seperti hari-hari biasa...Pada hipotesis saya kuasa besar Amerika akan runtuh akibat krisis ekonominya (Krisis hutang) pada 2019...Israel akan muncul sebagai kuasa besar pada 2020...New World Order (NWO)..

adakah tahun ini berkebetulan dengan wawasan 2020 negara malaysia ?....kiraan tahun ini adalah adalah berdasarkan sistem galaksi bima sakti mempunyai 12 planet dan 1 matahari...sama seperti surah yusuf..Jarak antara planet sehingga yang planet ke 12 yang baru dijumpai baru-baru ini (Planet Keppler B) selepas planet Al-Quttb dan planet X...kiraan masa cukup 1000 tahun...nabi yusuf bermimpi semua 12 bintang sujud kepadanya...surah al-Haj..sehari kamu di azab adalah seribu tahun lamanya seperti mana yang kamu hitung....sekarang u all carilah senjata Dajjal sangat mengerikan..teknologi HAARP...nak solat dulu...

You invade Bahrain. We take out Muammar Gaddafi: "The US-Saudi deal"

NATO - UN res 1973 "take out Gaddafi in Libya"

NWO operate in Benghazi

The revelation came from two different diplomats, a European and a member of the BRIC group, and was made separately to a US scholar and Asia Times Online. According to diplomatic protocol, their names cannot be disclosed. One of the diplomats said, "This is the reason why we could not support resolution 1973. We were arguing that Libya, Bahrain and Yemen were similar cases, and calling for a fact-finding mission. We maintain our official position that the resolution is not clear, and may be interpreted in a belligerent manner."

As Asia Times Online has reported, a full Arab League endorsement of a no-fly zone is a myth. Of the 22 full members, only 11 were present at the voting. Six of them were Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members, the US-supported club of Gulf kingdoms/sheikhdoms, of which Saudi Arabia is the top dog. Syria and Algeria were against it. Saudi Arabia only had to "seduce" three other members to get the vote.

Translation: only nine out of 22 members of the Arab League voted for the no-fly zone. The vote was essentially a House of Saud-led operation, with Arab League secretary general Amr Moussa keen to polish his CV with Washington with an eye to become the next Egyptian President.

Thus, in the beginning, there was the great 2011 Arab revolt. Then, inexorably, came the US-Saudi counter-revolution.

Profiteers rejoice 
Humanitarian imperialists will spin en masse this is a "conspiracy", as they have been spinning the bombing of Libya prevented a hypothetical massacre in Benghazi. They will be defending the House of Saud - saying it acted to squash Iranian subversion in the Gulf; obviously R2P - "responsibility to protect" does not apply to people in Bahrain. They will be heavily promoting post-Gaddafi Libya as a new - oily - human rights Mecca, complete with US intelligence assets, black ops, special forces and dodgy contractors.

Whatever they say won't alter the facts on the ground - the graphic results of the US-Saudi dirty dancing. Asia Times Online has already reported on who profits from the foreign intervention in Libya (see There's no business like war business, March 30). Players include the Pentagon (via Africom), the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Saudi Arabia, the Arab League's Moussa, and Qatar. Add to the list the al-Khalifa dynasty in Bahrain, assorted weapons contractors, and the usual neo-liberal suspects eager to privatize everything in sight in the new Libya - even the water. And we're not even talking about the Western vultures hovering over the Libyan oil and gas industry.

Exposed, above all, is the astonishing hypocrisy of the Obama administration, selling a crass geopolitical coup involving northern Africa and the Persian Gulf as a humanitarian operation. As for the fact of another US war on a Muslim nation, that's just a "kinetic military action".

There's been wide speculation in both the US and across the Middle East that considering the military stalemate - and short of the "coalition of the willing" bombing the Gaddafi family to oblivion - Washington, London and Paris might settle for the control of eastern Libya; a northern African version of an oil-rich Gulf Emirate. Gaddafi would be left with a starving North Korea-style Tripolitania.

But considering the latest high-value defections from the regime, plus the desired endgame ("Gaddafi must go", in President Obama's own words), Washington, London, Paris and Riyadh won't settle for nothing but the whole kebab. Including a strategic base for both Africom and NATO.

Round up the unusual suspects
One of the side effects of the dirty US-Saudi deal is that the White House is doing all it can to make sure the Bahrain drama is buried by US media. BBC America news anchor Katty Kay at least had the decency to stress, "they would like that one [Bahrain] to go away because there's no real upside for them in supporting the rebellion by the Shi'ites."

For his part the emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al Thani, showed up on al-Jazeera and said that action was needed because the Libyan people were attacked by Gaddafi. The otherwise excellent al-Jazeera journalists could have politely asked the emir whether he would send his Mirages to protect the people of Palestine from Israel, or his neighbors in Bahrain from Saudi Arabia.

The al-Khalifa dynasty in Bahrain is essentially a bunch of Sunni settlers who took over 230 years ago. For a great deal of the 20th century they were obliging slaves of the British empire. Modern Bahrain does not live under the specter of a push from Iran; that's an al-Khalifa (and House of Saud) myth.

Bahrainis, historically, have always rejected being part of a sort of Shi'ite nation led by Iran. The protests come a long way, and are part of a true national movement - way beyond sectarianism. No wonder the slogan in the iconic Pearl roundabout - smashed by the fearful al-Khalifa police state - was "neither Sunni nor Shi'ite; Bahraini".

What the protesters wanted was essentially a constitutional monarchy; a legitimate parliament; free and fair elections; and no more corruption. What they got instead was "bullet-friendly Bahrain" replacing "business-friendly Bahrain", and an invasion sponsored by the House of Saud.

And the repression goes on - invisible to US corporate media. Tweeters scream that everybody and his neighbor are being arrested. According to Nabeel Rajab, president of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, over 400 people are either missing or in custody, some of them "arrested at checkpoints controlled by thugs brought in from other Arab and Asian countries - they wear black masks in the streets." Even blogger Mahmood Al Yousif was arrested at 3 am, leading to fears that the same will happen to any Bahraini who has blogged, tweeted, or posted Facebook messages in favor of reform.

Globocop is on a roll 
Odyssey Dawn is now over. Enter Unified Protector - led by Canadian Charles Bouchard. Translation: the Pentagon (as in Africom) transfers the "kinetic military action " to itself (as in NATO, which is nothing but the Pentagon ruling over Europe). Africom and NATO are now one.

The NATO show will include air and cruise missile strikes; a naval blockade of Libyia; and shady, unspecified ground operations to help the "rebels". Hardcore helicopter gunship raids a la AfPak - with attached "collateral damage" - should be expected.

A curious development is already visible. NATO is deliberately allowing Gaddafi forces to advance along the Mediterranean coast and repel the "rebels". There have been no surgical air strikes for quite a while.

The objective is possibly to extract political and economic concessions from the defector and Libyan exile-infested Interim National Council (INC) - a dodgy cast of characters including former Justice minister Mustafa Abdel Jalil, US-educated former secretary of planning Mahmoud Jibril, and former Virginia resident, new "military commander" and CIA asset Khalifa Hifter. The laudable, indigenous February 17 Youth movement - which was in the forefront of the Benghazi uprising - has been completely sidelined.

This is NATO's first African war, as Afghanistan is NATO's first Central/South Asian war. Now firmly configured as the UN's weaponized arm, Globocop NATO is on a roll implementing its "strategic concept" approved at the Lisbon summit last November (see Welcome to NATOstan, Asia Times Online, November 20, 2010).

Gaddafi's Libya must be taken out so the Mediterranean - themare nostrum of ancient Rome - becomes a NATO lake. Libya is the only nation in northern Africa not subordinated to Africom or Centcom or any one of the myriad NATO "partnerships". The other non-NATO-related African nations are Eritrea, Sawahiri Arab Democratic Republic, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

Moreover, two members of NATO's "Istanbul Cooperation Initiative" - Qatar and the United Arab Emirates - are now fighting alongside Africom/NATO for the fist time. Translation: NATO and Persian Gulf partners are fighting a war in Africa. Europe? That's too provincial. Globocop is the way to go.

According to the Obama administration's own official doublespeak, dictators who are eligible for "US outreach" - such as in Bahrain and Yemen - may relax, and get away with virtually anything. As for those eligible for "regime alteration", from Africa to the Middle East and Asia, watch out. Globocop NATO is coming to get you. With or without dirty deals.

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).
By Pepe Escobar 



You invade Bahrain. We take out Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. This, in short, is the essence of a deal struck between the Barack Obama administration and the House of Saud. Two diplomatic sources at the United Nations independently confirmed that Washington, via Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, gave the go-ahead for Saudi Arabia to invade Bahrain and crush the pro-democracy movement in their neighbor in exchange for a "yes" vote by the Arab League for a no-fly zone over Libya - the main rationale that led to United Nations Security Council resolution 1973.